Truth about the Last King’s cell in Colombo Fort
By Chryshane Mendis
This article appeared in the Sunday Times Plus on 25th August 2018
The Prison cell of the last
King of Kandy, King Sri Wickrama Rajasingha in Colombo fort is a somewhat
well-known monument. It is situated within the premises of the Ceylinco House
building down Janadipathi Mawatha (Queen’s Street) at the turn off to Bank of
Ceylon Mawatha. Although it is commonly known as the prison where the last King
was kept, there appear currently two traditions to this story, a common
tradition and an academic tradition which states otherwise. So is this really
the prison cell in which Sri Wickrama Rajasinghe was kept? Let us explore the
facts.
The
popular story goes that the King was kept in a cell within the fort of Colombo
before his departure, but is it the actual story? Was he imprisoned or placed
under house arrest as said by some? King Sri Wickrama Rajasingha was captured
on the 18th February 1815 in Madamahanuwara and was transferred to
Colombo without entering Kandy. On the 6th of March the King and his
escort entered the Colombo fort where they were received by Colonel Kerr, the
commandant of the garrison. Here the King remained for nearly a year till the
24th of January 1816 when he and his family was deported to Vellore
aboard the HMS Cornwallis.
But,
according to the Official Government Gazette and the writings of Dr. Henry
Marshall, he was kept in a house and placed under house arrest, and not
in a cell. To quote the Gazette No. 704, Wednesday, 15th March 1815:
“On the Monday following Major Hook with the Detachment under his command escorting the late King of Kandy and his family entered the Fort…He is logged in a House in the Fort which has been suitably prepared for his reception and is stockaded round to prevent any intrusion on his privacy”
This
being an official Government document cements the fact that he was placed in a
house specially prepared for him as mentioned above. Further the account of Dr.
Henry Marshall too is to be noted here. In his celebrated work Ceylon: a general description of the
island and its inhabitants, with a historical sketch of the conquest of the
colony by the English published in 1846 and reprinted by Tisara
Prakasakayo in 1969, he states that
“ the prison or house provided for him was spacious, and handsomely fitted up. He was obviously well pleased with his new adobe, and upon entering it, observed, “As I am no longer permitted to be a King, I am thankful for the kindness and attention which have been shown to me”
Adding
further in his book he also gives a dialog between him and the King in Colombo,
whom he was requested to visit professionally; he states that he found the king
frank and affable and willing to converse on any subject. It is given that
apart from Kandyan matters, the former king also asked Dr. Marshall aspects of
his personal life such as the duration of his stay in the island, and his home
in England. The writings of Dr. Marshall, a contemporary of this incident,
further confirm beyond doubt, that the King was placed within a house in the
fort and not in a prison cell.
So
where did we go wrong? How did it come to be associated with the last King of
Kandy, as the above clearly show that it was not! Having given facts that dispel
the myth of the late king being placed in a cell, it is important to see the
whereabouts of the said house. Through a brief study done by the writer, only
the reference from R. L. Brohire’s Changing
Face of Colombo was found indicating the location of the said
house. He states it to be a Dutch dwelling house, which was later occupied by
the Darley Butler firm; this is the present site of the Ceylinco House, the
location of the present monument. The fact that a Dutch house existed at this
site is also confirmed by the book When the going gets tough, the tough gets
going: a history of Ceylinco Insurance. An investigation into the location
of this site from the maps of 1733 and 1756-59 from Comprehensive Atlas of the Dutch United East India
Company Vol. IV Ceylon, it is clear that the block along the
Janadipathi Mawatha from Ceylinco House to the National Mutual Building (Center
Point Building) was a residential area for officers of the Dutch East India
Company. Thus it is clear that the present site of the Ceylinco House was the
site of a Dutch house during the 1700s and would have most likely been there in
1815, which is just 19 years after the takeover of the Colombo fort by the
British.
Then,
what is the present monument? What was its function? When was it built? R. L.
Brohier states in his Changing
Face of Colombo: “The monument has no greater significance
possibly than that of having been a sentry box set up at the gate-way to the
adjoining garrison building erected by the British in 1875 (Echelon square
buildings- now demolished)”. Thus R.
L. Brohier claims that this was a guard house of the adjoining Echelon
barracks. To further test this, the writer conducted a deeper inquiry which
proved what Brohier states.
Between the timeline of the
Dutch house and the present Ceylinco building on this block, is another
building, that of the Darley Butler building and a map of 1904/5 of Colombo
from the National Archives shows a small box shaped structure just bordering
the Darley Butler building to the south. A closer examination of it from a much
clearer map of 1938 showed this particular structure within the boundary of the
Echelon barracks, it appears to have been a guardroom as there is an entrance
to the barracks just by it facing Queen’s road. This could be clearly seen from
a photograph of a date around
the 1920s/30s from the book Extract from Sea Ports of India and
Ceylon.
When analyzing the position
of this guardroom and the present monument from the 1904/5 map, an aerial image
of 1960 and a present satellite image in relation to the Darley Butler building
and the Ceylinco House, it clearly shows that both the guardroom and the
present monument are the same.
But
then this brings us to another problem, the outlook of the present monument
looks totally different to the guardroom. This brings to conclusion that as
both the guardroom and the present monument fit to the same location, there
appears to have been a modification or complete remodeling effected to the
guardroom by 1960, as a photograph taken from the Baur’s building in 1960 (in
the book The Faithful Foreigner, Thilo Hoffmann) shows the present
monument with its prominent vaulted roof and ventilation duct.
Therefore
the present monument was indeed a guardroom of the Echelon barracks as stated
by Dr. R. L. Brohier. So as to why its appearance was changed and then being
associated with being the prison cell of the last King, we may never know.
Somewhere down the line for political reasons or either, this claim was brought
up and acted upon officially by the authorities; as this is a protected
archaeological monument at present and contains the official Department of
Archaeology description as well as a granite inscription stating the same.
It
is therefore clear from this article that the King was not kept in a cell and
that the present monument belongs to a later period. This article aims at
changing this public view, hence a humble request to all enthusiasts and tour
operators - do not mislead the tourist on this site as the cell of King Sri
Wickrama Rajasingha; but it still could be taken as a 'Monument' to the Last
King of Sri Lanka of the location where he last stayed in the island before his
departure to India.
A more descriptive research
article on this by the writer with references can be found in the website www.archaeology.lk
Comments
Post a Comment